Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Engineering Group holds $21.4M in lifetime obligations with a 76.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Centurion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $21.4M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Centurion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 76.2%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Centurion Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.8M
Recompete Win Rate:76.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):517311
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512