Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Engineering Group holds $21.4M in lifetime obligations with a 76.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $21.4M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Centurion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 76.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.8M
Recompete Win Rate:76.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):517311
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512