Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Global Services holds $43.5M in lifetime obligations with a 72.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Global Services Lifetime Spend: $43.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Global Services Recompete Win %: 72.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Global Services Top Agency: Department of Justice
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Global Services
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.8M
Recompete Win Rate:72.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:52 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334419
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512