Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Global Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Global Services holds $1.01B in lifetime obligations with a 94.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Centurion Global Services Lifetime Spend: $1.01B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Centurion Global Services Recompete Win %: 94.2%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Centurion Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.01B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$403.9M
Recompete Win Rate:94.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:147
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):622110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence