Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Global Services holds $1.01B in lifetime obligations with a 94.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Global Services Lifetime Spend: $1.01B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Centurion Global Services Recompete Win %: 94.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Global Services
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.01B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$403.9M
Recompete Win Rate:94.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:147
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):622110
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512