Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Scientific Corp vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Scientific Corp and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Scientific Corp holds $9.4M in lifetime obligations with a 81.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Centurion Scientific Corp Lifetime Spend: $9.4M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Scientific Corp Recompete Win %: 81.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Scientific Corp Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Scientific Corp

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$9.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.4M
Recompete Win Rate:81.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:4
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):511210
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Centurion Scientific Corp
UEI: ZQYMTK3Y4128 • Washington, SC
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA