Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Security Solutions vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Security Solutions and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Security Solutions holds $572.9M in lifetime obligations with a 91.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Centurion Security Solutions Lifetime Spend: $572.9M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Centurion Security Solutions Recompete Win %: 91.7%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Centurion Security Solutions Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Security Solutions

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$572.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$185.9M
Recompete Win Rate:91.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:131
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Security Solutions vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence