Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Security Solutions vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Security Solutions and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Security Solutions holds $12.6M in lifetime obligations with a 87.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Centurion Security Solutions Lifetime Spend: $12.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Security Solutions Recompete Win %: 87.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Security Solutions Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Security Solutions

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$12.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.7M
Recompete Win Rate:87.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Centurion Security Solutions
UEI: ASG8H64DC6B3 • San Diego, CA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA