Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Security Solutions vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Security Solutions and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Security Solutions holds $24.4M in lifetime obligations with a 84.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Centurion Security Solutions Lifetime Spend: $24.4M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Centurion Security Solutions Recompete Win %: 84.4%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Centurion Security Solutions Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Security Solutions

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.9M
Recompete Win Rate:84.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:7
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):511210
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Security Solutions vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence