Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Technical Services holds $728.2M in lifetime obligations with a 77.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Centurion Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $728.2M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Technical Services Recompete Win %: 77.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Technical Services Top Agency: Department of Justice
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$728.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$307.6M
Recompete Win Rate:77.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:84
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Centurion Technical Services
UEI: G7PXWHYRLWGE • Washington, AL
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA