Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Technical Services holds $26.7M in lifetime obligations with a 72.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Centurion Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $26.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Centurion Technical Services Recompete Win %: 72.8%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Centurion Technical Services Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$26.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.8M
Recompete Win Rate:72.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence