Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Technical Services holds $30.2M in lifetime obligations with a 88.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $30.2M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Centurion Technical Services Recompete Win %: 88.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Technical Services Top Agency: Department of Energy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Technical Services
Total Lifetime Obligations:$30.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.3M
Recompete Win Rate:88.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:11
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541810
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512