Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Technical Services holds $785.5M in lifetime obligations with a 76.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $785.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Technical Services Recompete Win %: 76.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Technical Services Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Technical Services
Total Lifetime Obligations:$785.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$212.5M
Recompete Win Rate:76.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:70
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334511
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512