Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Technical Services holds $28.5M in lifetime obligations with a 96.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Centurion Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $28.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Technical Services Recompete Win %: 96.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Technical Services Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$28.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.6M
Recompete Win Rate:96.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561320
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Centurion Technical Services
UEI: UC982RU9ARZU • Washington, NM
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA