Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Technical Services holds $29.6M in lifetime obligations with a 75.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $29.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Technical Services Recompete Win %: 75.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Technical Services Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Technical Services
Total Lifetime Obligations:$29.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.7M
Recompete Win Rate:75.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:6
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512