Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

CNFA vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between CNFA and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: CNFA holds $67.0M in lifetime obligations with a 81.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•CNFA Lifetime Spend: $67.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•CNFA Recompete Win %: 81.0%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•CNFA Top Agency: Agency for International Development
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

CNFA

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$67.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$23.4M
Recompete Win Rate:81.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:2
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
CNFA
UEI: KF52CMT56HV4 • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX