Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC and THE BOEING COMPANY: CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC holds $68.81B in lifetime obligations with a 81.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC Lifetime Spend: $68.81B
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC Recompete Win %: 81.2%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC Top Agency: Department of Energy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$68.81B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$24.08B
Recompete Win Rate:81.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:2
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence