Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and THE BOEING COMPANY: CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY holds $1.19B in lifetime obligations with a 90.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $1.19B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Recompete Win %: 90.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Top Agency: Agency for International Development
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.19B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$416.0M
Recompete Win Rate:90.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512