Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Crest Applied Sciences holds $33.9M in lifetime obligations with a 83.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Crest Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $33.9M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Crest Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 83.1%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Crest Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Energy
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.7M
Recompete Win Rate:83.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:6
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488510
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Crest Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence