Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Crest Applied Sciences holds $22.7M in lifetime obligations with a 73.1% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Crest Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $22.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Crest Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 73.1%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Crest Applied Sciences Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$22.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.7M
Recompete Win Rate:73.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:7
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Crest Applied Sciences
UEI: M11C5GAHBJ67 • Washington, IA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA