Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Crest Consulting Group holds $288.6M in lifetime obligations with a 90.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Crest Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $288.6M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Crest Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.3%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Crest Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$288.6M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$71.1M

Recompete Win Rate:90.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:194

Average Award Cycle:57 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541614

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512