Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Crest Consulting Group holds $34.7M in lifetime obligations with a 91.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Crest Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $34.7M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Crest Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Crest Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$34.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.0M
Recompete Win Rate:91.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Crest Consulting Group
UEI: 27DEZY9CEWJP • Washington, NJ
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA