Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Crest Consulting Group holds $34.7M in lifetime obligations with a 91.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Crest Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $34.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Crest Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Crest Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$34.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.0M
Recompete Win Rate:91.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Crest Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence