Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Crest Consulting Group holds $15.2M in lifetime obligations with a 72.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Crest Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $15.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Crest Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 72.2%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Crest Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$15.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.1M
Recompete Win Rate:72.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:20
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541380
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Crest Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence