Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Crest Engineering Group holds $3.5M in lifetime obligations with a 90.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Crest Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $3.5M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Crest Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 90.2%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Crest Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.4M
Recompete Win Rate:90.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Crest Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence