Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Crest Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Crest Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Crest Engineering Group holds $3.5M in lifetime obligations with a 90.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Crest Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $3.5M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Crest Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 90.2%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Crest Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Crest Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.4M
Recompete Win Rate:90.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Crest Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence