Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

CyberCore Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between CyberCore Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: CyberCore Consulting Group holds $40.3M in lifetime obligations with a 93.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

CyberCore Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $40.3M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
CyberCore Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 93.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
CyberCore Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

CyberCore Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.3M
Recompete Win Rate:93.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561422
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
CyberCore Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence