Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

CyberCore Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between CyberCore Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: CyberCore Consulting Group holds $38.7M in lifetime obligations with a 73.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•CyberCore Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $38.7M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•CyberCore Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 73.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•CyberCore Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

CyberCore Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$38.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$15.7M
Recompete Win Rate:73.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
CyberCore Consulting Group
UEI: 81Q4JTK8L6AP • Washington, AK
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX