Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

CyberCore Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between CyberCore Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: CyberCore Consulting Group holds $32.0M in lifetime obligations with a 88.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•CyberCore Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $32.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•CyberCore Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 88.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•CyberCore Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

CyberCore Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$32.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.0M
Recompete Win Rate:88.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:4
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
CyberCore Consulting Group
UEI: E5W0H73SW1RW • Washington, OH
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
UEI: FYHNA5WC8XD7 • Washington, NM