Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $33.1M in lifetime obligations with a 78.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $33.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.5M
Recompete Win Rate:78.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:55 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Dynamic Applied Sciences
UEI: Q1AZ0CRX2E5R • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence