Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $33.1M in lifetime obligations with a 78.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $33.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.2%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.5M
Recompete Win Rate:78.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:55 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence