Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $1.21B in lifetime obligations with a 91.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $1.21B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 91.0%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: General Services Administration
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.21B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$483.0M
Recompete Win Rate:91.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:113
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence