Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $1.21B in lifetime obligations with a 91.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $1.21B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 91.0%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: General Services Administration
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.21B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$483.0M
Recompete Win Rate:91.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:113
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence