Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $10.8M in lifetime obligations with a 95.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $10.8M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 95.8%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: General Services Administration
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$10.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$2.4M
Recompete Win Rate:95.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:17
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):562910
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Dynamic Applied Sciences
UEI: NEU803MA3U47 • Washington, IL
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX