Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $16.4M in lifetime obligations with a 74.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $16.4M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 74.5%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.5M
Recompete Win Rate:74.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:10
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence