Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $16.4M in lifetime obligations with a 74.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $16.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 74.5%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.5M

Recompete Win Rate:74.5%

Active Prime Task Orders:10

Average Award Cycle:53 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541990

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512