Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $16.4M in lifetime obligations with a 74.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $16.4M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 74.5%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.5M
Recompete Win Rate:74.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:10
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence