Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Applied Sciences holds $20.7M in lifetime obligations with a 73.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Dynamic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $20.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Dynamic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 73.4%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Dynamic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$20.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.3M
Recompete Win Rate:73.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:5
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):492110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence