Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Consulting Group holds $1.15B in lifetime obligations with a 92.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Dynamic Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $1.15B

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Dynamic Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 92.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Dynamic Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.15B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$506.6M

Recompete Win Rate:92.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:75

Average Award Cycle:49 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541519

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512