Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Dynamic Defense Systems vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $37.3M in lifetime obligations with a 77.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $37.3M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 77.8%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Dynamic Defense Systems
Total Lifetime Obligations:$37.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.0M
Recompete Win Rate:77.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:40 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541513
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512