Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Dynamic Defense Systems vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $1.20B in lifetime obligations with a 91.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $1.20B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 91.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Dynamic Defense Systems
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.20B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$310.7M
Recompete Win Rate:91.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:85
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512