Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $1.20B in lifetime obligations with a 91.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $1.20B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 91.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.20B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$310.7M
Recompete Win Rate:91.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:85
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Dynamic Defense Systems
UEI: D0MFR4QNPA93 • Washington, AZ
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA