Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $1.20B in lifetime obligations with a 91.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $1.20B
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 91.7%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.20B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$310.7M
Recompete Win Rate:91.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:85
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence