Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Defense Systems vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $21.4M in lifetime obligations with a 80.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $21.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 80.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Army

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Defense Systems

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.6M

Recompete Win Rate:80.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:28

Average Award Cycle:48 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541519

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512