Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $21.4M in lifetime obligations with a 80.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $21.4M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 80.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.6M
Recompete Win Rate:80.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Dynamic Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence