Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Defense Systems vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Defense Systems and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Defense Systems holds $8.9M in lifetime obligations with a 89.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $8.9M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Dynamic Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 89.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Dynamic Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Defense Systems

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$8.9M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.8M

Recompete Win Rate:89.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:20

Average Award Cycle:43 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):334511

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512