Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Engineering Group holds $33.2M in lifetime obligations with a 79.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $33.2M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Dynamic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 79.9%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Dynamic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.2M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.0M

Recompete Win Rate:79.9%

Active Prime Task Orders:11

Average Award Cycle:56 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541990

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512