Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Engineering Group holds $27.7M in lifetime obligations with a 84.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Dynamic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $27.7M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Dynamic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 84.3%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Dynamic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Justice

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$27.7M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.1M

Recompete Win Rate:84.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:9

Average Award Cycle:34 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):511210

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512