Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Engineering Group holds $22.8M in lifetime obligations with a 74.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $22.8M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Dynamic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 74.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Dynamic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Justice

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$22.8M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.5M

Recompete Win Rate:74.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:4

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):332993

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512