Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Engineering Group holds $24.1M in lifetime obligations with a 92.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Dynamic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $24.1M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Dynamic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 92.4%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Dynamic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.1M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.2M

Recompete Win Rate:92.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:18

Average Award Cycle:45 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561210

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512