Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Global Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Dynamic Global Services holds $42.8M in lifetime obligations with a 73.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Dynamic Global Services Lifetime Spend: $42.8M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Dynamic Global Services Recompete Win %: 73.7%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Dynamic Global Services Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Global Services

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.8M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$19.0M

Recompete Win Rate:73.7%

Active Prime Task Orders:6

Average Award Cycle:33 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):488190

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512