Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Systems Inc. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Systems Inc. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Dynamic Systems Inc. holds $21.4M in lifetime obligations with a 83.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Dynamic Systems Inc. Lifetime Spend: $21.4M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Dynamic Systems Inc. Recompete Win %: 83.5%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Dynamic Systems Inc. Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Systems Inc.

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.9M
Recompete Win Rate:83.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:4
Average Award Cycle:50 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Dynamic Systems Inc.
UEI: 6JGW8AJB56UT • Washington, UT
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX