Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Dynamic Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Dynamic Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Dynamic Technical Services holds $4.3M in lifetime obligations with a 89.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Dynamic Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $4.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Dynamic Technical Services Recompete Win %: 89.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Dynamic Technical Services Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Dynamic Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$4.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.3M
Recompete Win Rate:89.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Dynamic Technical Services
UEI: F3KA83DYG2R2 • Washington, MT
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA